Why write a blog? Why would I sit and start typing to answer a question I’ve barely even thought about? Why wouldn’t I review, edit, and redraft this post? Why would I just start writing, review some thoughts and then, when it feels finished, end the post? It’s how I’ve been blogging and it’s as interesting a question to me as it is to my hand which is typing these thoughts just a hair slower than I’m thinking them.
Quality vs quantity, high quality vs high volume. The great debate for artists. There are both types of artists for sure, is there a better strategy? Probably not. Some people love refining, some people love variety. High volume affords a potentially higher variety of creativity, higher refinement allows for greater precision with a more curated and careful result.
Doing nothing, creates nothing, and hones no skill. Pushing volume creates muscle memory and efficiency in bulk delivery, it conditions the mind to do the work to get started, it’s sloppy but it’s movement. Striving for perfection can only be applied to a person who is comfortable with delivering volume. I’m not a writer, so writing is a good start to developing the first skill needed to be one, the ability to sit, and put thoughts into written words. To organize ideas for transmission.
Somewhere around 38 years old, I was gifted a guitar. It was some time in the early days of Covid lockdown and there was an assumption we might learn some instruments with the downtime. It didn’t work. I didn’t start. I didn’t pick the thing up. When lockdown lifted, there was an idea of donating the unused instruments we had accumulated to free up space, instead, we signed up for guitar lessons. Well, my partner signed me up for a couple, which was brilliant.
A single guitar lesson, forces you to increase your playing output. Your playing time, goes from 0% to 100% on day one. If your lesson is an hour, that’s a pretty significant bump from 0 seconds of prior work. Even if you never practice, a weekly lesson is some progress towards a goal. In a million years at that pace, you would become a master just before dying. Being 38, I thought it would be better to try to practice the thing daily. Guitar practice is part volume and part precision. Chord shapes, chord changes, fingering and strumming patterns, metronome work, noodling.
Noodling is playing things on the guitar that you enjoy playing but don’t progress your skill. It’s an enjoyment of the instrument but it doesn’t necessarily make you better at playing it. Practice is the harder part, practice is a bit frustrating, you aren’t reading the music correctly, your hands can’t retain the correct shapes, your arm and fingers are strumming or plucking the correct strings.
They say practice at least 15 minutes a day, they mean the frustrating part. Noodling is the gift to yourself as you’re able to make music with the tool after all the frustration you’ve poured into it. When you practice for a short time daily, you do progress and that time you spend pushing your brain and muscles to absorb new patterns becomes justified. Like a soldier dying peacefully on a battlefield assuming they served some purpose, the song takes the pain of learning away. It becomes easier to practice as the muscle memory of the process becomes clear.
It’s true with running. Your mind wants to escape to process for the first mile, but after the 7th mile, it settles in to accepting its fate. When thinking back on the run, after the pain has faded, you only remember a vague idea of the pain but a vivid memory of the scenic hills in the first mile, or the Washington monument around mile nine as you worked your way through all of Baltimore.
This is the problem with volume. What would I edit out of what I’ve just written? What is pertinent to the audience? Doesn’t matter. I’m building reps. Am I noodling? Doesn’t feel like it. This feels like guitar practice. It feels like running that first mile. Maybe I’m not writing enough. Maybe I’ve got to put a volume of thoughts into words, into sentences, into paragraphs, into posts before I nail this thing down.
If I could get comfortable with generating the work, where the process itself feels effortless, maybe then I’ll add the effort for revisions and drafts and tight edits, right now, writing is its own challenge, and I’m enjoying the fight.
I listened to an interview with Bill Burr and Terry Gross a couple of weeks ago. Bill was being more candid than he typically is, because he was discussing abuse and trauma. At one point he blames women for some awful aspect of men, and Terry calls him out for it. Why would he blame women and not the men for their own behavior and lack of accountability within their own group? Bill couldn’t really process a valid response. He provided an obviously canned answer which didn’t address the concern. Then I realized he had pinned his opinion on the matter to his joke and couldn’t see his way around it.
The work of a master stand up comedian is not creating a joke, it is editing a joke into the most precise form of the joke, so that it is concise, easily understood, and most importantly, consistently delivers a laugh. This is brutal to see in action, if you have a local comedy club, go to open mics and watch new comedians tell the same jokes night after night with the slightest modifications each time. I love comedy, I’ve done some stand up, I hate this process, I hate telling the same dozen jokes over and over again, it absolutely makes better jokes but it limits ideas.
A master comedian is going to be much closer to the finished structure from the very beginning because they largely have a sense of what will work from all of their previous success but they still go through this process.
I recognized in Bill Burr’s response to Terry Gross, that he had thought about the irony that the me-too movement had missed other behaviors that men are guilty of that may or may not be worse than the lesser reasons some people were “cancelled” (became unmarketable if you ask me). Bill had processed this thought as a joke, women had created the me-too movement, me were being punished, but also men were becoming more vocal about being Nazis, isn’t it funny women didn’t address that?
The structure is there, it’s a joke, it has funny impressions that can be worked into it, and a little bit of thought but when confronted on the logic, it made no sense, and after all the reps Bill had put in to perfect the structure, he had convinced himself the idea was sound. You could tell in his response to the question of why don’t men hold men accountable that he hadn’t considered it but recognized his folly. He took an initial idea, and diligently polished it, even though the idea itself is stupid.
Bill Burr is a brilliant comedian, and stupid ideas are the foundation of all kinds of comedy, and it’s completely fine for a joke to not reflect the principles of the teller. There are more serious refinements in the world that have much more hazardous outcomes. Donald J Trump got it in his head in the 1980s that a lack of tariffs were the main reason the U.S. was losing jobs to manufacturing overseas. He’s refined his idea to believe that they’re the solution to that and all other foreign policy challenges. A refinement navigating a herd off a cliff, finely polishing the wings off the commercial airliner that is the U.S. economy, or, this is where a comedian would put an additional joke to satisfy the rule of threes in comedy but I have no editor.
I think I like not being so cornered in my thinking. Quality requires refinement and locks things into a shape. The metronome makes for a perfectly executed performance but the closer to the metronome you get, the more the music sounds robotic. The uneven delivery of a human makes it sound much more satisfying. The unexpected end to a blog post has a similar resonance.